Western Science Judges' rubric
| Quality/variety |
Some samples are of poor quality. Score 1 |
Most local samples have been collected. The samples are of good quality.
Score 3 |
The collection is thorough. The local possibilities have been exhausted.
The samples are of high quality with all sizes, colors, types and shapes possible. Score 5 |
|
| Creativity | The collection shows little original thought. | There is evidence of creative thought in the gathering and presentation of the collection. | There is clear evidence of creative thought and ingenuity. | |
| Presentation | Speech is too soft. There is little enthusiasm or interest.
The display is not organized. |
Speech is loud, clear and thoughts are orderly.
The display is organized and understandable. |
The presentation is loud, clear and orderly, given with enthusiasm.
The display is clear, attractive and easy to understand. |
|
| Data | There is no data about where and when the samples were taken. | There is some data indicating where and when the samples were collected. | The data of where and when the collection was made is very understandable. |
| The presentation by the student and display of his/her project maintains the cultural values of his/her area. |
|
|
|
| The student's work is well done. The project is organized and attractive. It shows good thought. The presentation is clear and confident. |
|
|
|
| The project is a study of something that is important to the land, village/community, and culture |
|
|
|
| There is evidence that the student consulted with one ormore community elders, local experts and other cultural resources. |
|
|
|