HOW WELL ARE INDIAN
CHILDREN EDUCATED?
Chapter
Two
*METHODS OF STUDY
and INTERPRETATION
Indian groups throughout the country differ greatly
in their cultural background. Some Indian school children belong
to tribes to whom
educational opportunities have been available for as long as
150 years, whereas others belong to tribes in which these children
ore the first generation to whom educational opportunities have
been available. Differences also exist as a result of contrasting
environments. Many Indian children are bilingual and most of
them
have rural backgrounds. Since most standardized tests depend
upon language-the language of urban life such tests have limitations.
An evaluation of the achievement of Indian children by merely
comparing
their scores on verbal tests with the scores of white children
from urban communities would tell little or nothing concerning
the attainment of the Indian children. It had been suggested
that one might find relatively little difference between the achievement
of Indian children who attend public schools and white children
from rural environments, since those who attend public schools
come from less isolated environments than do the majority of
the
Indian children in federal schools. Another factor indicated
for study was the difference in environment offered to pupils by
different
kinds of Indian schools.
Most day school students have no contact with English except
during the few hours when they are in school, whereas the students
in
boarding schools are exposed to English during the entire twenty-four
hours of the day. Probably the most important difference in school
environment is that which relates to the special curricula provided
students in Indian schools. The home environment of most Indian
students does not provide them with certain types of training
in health practices, rural practices and home economics, which
most
rural white children receive at home. Because of this, the Indian
schools attempt to provide those things which are not always
included in the public school curriculum. Moreover the vocational
objectives of many of the Indian groups differ from the objectives
of other Indian groups or white students to the extent that the
curriculum in each school must
be adapted to the special needs of its students.
It was decided that certain measuring instruments should be tried
experimentally during 1944, the first year of the study. Staff
members from the Education Division of the Indian Service, with
the assistance of staff members of the Department of Education
of the University of Chicago, analyzed existing tests. Where
suitable tests were not available, they constructed tests in
those fields
of rural life education to which Indian schools devote considerable
attention. The selection and preparation of the measuring instruments
finally employed, resulted from a consideration of the following:
1) the immediate and far-reaching purposes of the testing program,
2) the educational program suited to the needs of students now
enrolled in Indian schools,
3) the level of Indian pupil achievement
in tool subjects such as reading, English, arithmetic and penmanship,
4) the effect that certain differences in educational and home
environments (e.g. school attended, language of the parents,
etc.) may have had upon the Indian student's achievement.
5) the available
measuring instruments with particular reference to:
a) their wide age or educational range, thereby making the
test suitable for students with widely differing abilities,
b)
reliability or dependability of the measure,
c) validity
for purposes intended,
d) simplicity of directions,
e) ease of indicating answers
or choices,
f) simplicity of scoring,
g) availability of useful norms,
h) strange or unusual vocabulary,
6) the assembly of information that will provide a better understanding
of Indian students and their families,
7) the assembly of information
which lends itself to a useful, long-range program.
Table II-1 lists the evaluation instruments which were selected
or prepared for use in the trial program in 1944. The standardized
tests included were selected because it was believed they would
meet many of the requirements of the program.
TABLE II-1--TESTS USED APRIL 1944
|
Form Used |
Iowa Every-Pupil Tests |
Test A. Silent Reading Comprehension, Form O
|
Iowa Every-Pupil Tests |
Test C. Basic Language Skills, Form O |
Iowa Every-Pupil Tests |
Arithmetic, Parts I, II and III, Form O |
Natural Resources |
USIS-1944. (Mimeographed edition) |
Health and Safety |
USIS-1944. (Mimeographed edition)
|
The Iowa Every-Pupil Tests, used in the trial battery of tests, employ a rather
complicated system of answering items in order to facilitate mechanical scoring.
Such a scheme presented an additional and unnecessary hurdle to Indian children,
unfamiliar with this method of response. A review of the difficulties encountered
by the students on items in the reading and arithmetic tests in the Iowa battery
also revealed that the types of errors seemed to be caused by the fact that
the content material was foreign to rural experience, thereby defeating the
purposes of the tests. For those two reasons, the Iowa battery was replaced
in 1945 by other tests as indicated in Table II-2.
The Indian Service tests in Natural Resources and Health and Safety (the Rural
Practices Tests) administered experimentally in 1944 proved to contain certain
language hurdles. Consequently, these tests were revised in the light of these
findings and other tests were prepared for inclusion in the 1945 program. In
all of these, there was an effort to minimize the reading skill required for
understanding and responding to each content item.
The pilot study of 1944 was exceedingly helpful in revealing many additional
factors which required consideration in this program. The results were based
on samples too small to warrant any conclusions concerning the achievement
of Indian students.
As indicated in Chapter I, it was decided that the 1945 program should include
all of the eighth grade students in Indian schools, as well as students in
a selected group of public and mission schools. The total number of students
tested in each type of school was as follows:
1945 Distribution of Students Tested
Boarding School Students |
281 |
Day School Students |
378 |
Mission School Students |
196 |
Non-Reservation School Students |
198 |
Miscellaneous Indian Students |
246 |
Public School Students |
786
______ |
Total Students |
2,085
|
The test battery was administered in each of the schools by personnel selected
by the area superintendent of education. Only persons who had previously had
test experience were used in the administration and in 1945 the tests were
administered by persons not connected with the schools in which they were given.
Table II-2 lists the test battery given to all eighth grade students in the
spring of 1945.
TABLE II-2--TESTS AND MATERIALS USED APRIL 1945
Name of Test or Sheet |
Form Used |
Background Questionnaire |
USIS-Haskell-3-10-45 |
Sample Test Sheets |
USIS-Haskell-3-10-45 |
Gates Basic Reading Test |
Form 4. Types A, B, C, and D |
Pressey Reading Test |
Vocabulary Section Only |
Pressey English Test |
Form C. Parts A, B, C, and D |
Orleans Arithmetic Test |
B-Computation Form I |
Orleans Arithmetic Test |
C-Reasoning Form I |
Home Economics |
USIS-HE-45 |
Use of Resources |
Genera l-USIS-3-45 |
Use of Resources |
Regional USIS-0-45 (for Oklahoma) |
|
USIS-S-45 (for Southwest) |
|
USIS-D-45 (for Dakota) |
|
USIS-M-45 (for Mountain) |
Health and Safety |
USIS-1-45 |
Credit |
USIS-2-45 |
Free Writing A |
USIS-A-45 |
Free Writing B |
USIS-B-45
|
All of the papers from this program were scored in the Chicago Office by a
group of well-qualified teachers. Reports on the performance of each individual
student within a school, together with graphic norm sheets showing the distribution
of scores in each type of school and in each region included, were then distributed
to the administrators of the schools which participated.
A good many tentative conclusions, discussed in detail in the following chapters,
resulted from the data collected and assembled in 1945. In addition, the need
for other, specific data became apparent. It was recognized that many questions
can be answered only by following the progress of the same students during
a period of several years. However, it was decided to extend the student sample
to include students in grades four and twelve the following year, in order
that differences in relation to grade level could be observed. In 1946, the
tests were administered again to students in selected public and mission schools
in order that comparative data for rural white children, and for Indian children
in public and mission schools might be available. The total number * of students
tested in each grade and in each type of school was as follows:
1946 DISTRIBUTION OF STUDENTS TESTED
|
Grade 4 |
Grade 8 |
Grade 12 |
Boarding School Students |
413 |
289 |
65 |
Day School Students |
956 |
253 |
17 |
Mission School Students |
212 |
131 |
35 |
Non-Reservation School Students |
134 |
134 |
295 |
Miscellaneous Indian Students |
228 |
287 |
88 |
Public School Students |
950 |
595 |
242 |
Total Students |
2,893 |
1,689 |
742
|
* These figures include only those students for whom sufficient data were available
to justify the inclusion of their test scores in the compilation of norm sheets.
The standardized tests used in the 1945 program proved sufficiently satisfactory
so that all of them were included in the 1946 battery for twelfth grade students.
Several of the some tests were administered to fourth graders in 1946. Use
of identical test instruments both years made it possible to compare the new
data with that collected from the eighth grade students the previous year.
This eliminated the necessity of repeating all of the tests at the eighth grade
level in 1946. Many of the schools were supplied with all tests for eighth
grade students at their own request, in order that they might collect additional
information on the students in their own schools. The 1945 Credit Test was
omitted because the number of items in the test was so small that it was decided
to include them at a later date as a part of another test. The use of regional
tests in resources presented a number of problems which made it seem advisable
to incorporate those items which tended to be somewhat general in nature, into
the General Resources Test. In this test all items clearly having only regional
significance were omitted. The Rural Practices Vocabulary Test was constructed
and administered to students in grades eight and twelve. The Gates Advanced
Primary Reading Tests were selected for testing the reading achievement of
the fourth grade students. The Background Questionnaire was revised to include
additional data for study. Table II-3 lists the tests included in the 1946
battery.
TABLE II-3--TESTS AND MATERIALS USED APRIL 1946
Name of Test and Form Used |
Grades
In Which Administered
|
Fourth |
Eighth |
Twelfth |
Background Questionnaire, Form Haskell, 3-46
|
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Sample Test Sheet, Form Haskell, 3-45 |
No |
Yes |
Yes
|
Gates Basic Reading Test, Form 4, Types A, B, C, and D
|
No |
** |
Yes |
Gates Advanced Primary Reading Tests, Types I and II,
Form 3
|
Yes |
No |
No |
Pressey English, Form C. Parts A, B, C, and D
|
No |
** |
Yes |
Pressey Reading Test (Vocabulary Section Only) Form A
|
Yes |
** |
Yes |
OrIeans Arithmetic Computation, Form I
|
Yes |
** |
Yes |
Orleans Arithmetic Reasoning, Form I |
No |
** |
Yes |
Rural Practices Vocabulary, Form USIS-A-46
|
No |
|
es |
Free Writing, Form A, USIS-A-45 |
Yes |
** |
Yes |
Health and Safety, Form USIS-1-45 |
No |
** |
Yes |
Home Economics, Form USIS-HE-45 |
No |
** |
Girls only
|
USAFI General Science, Form SGSC-1-B-4
|
No |
Okla. only |
Yes |
Use of Resources, Revised, Form USIS-3-46
|
No |
Yes |
Yes |
** Those principals who wished to do so were permitted to administer these
tests to eighth grade students in their own schools.
It was decided that the problems of test administration and scoring would be
considerably lessened by the use of a larger number of administrators, and
by having the multiple response type test scored in the field. Through the
cooperation of area superintendents of Indian education, persons who were well-qualified
to follow the detailed instructions furnished to them were selected to administer
the tests in 1946. In some instances, it was recommended that the tests be
administered by the classroom teacher. The manual of instructions was prepared
in sufficient detail to make the test administration relatively uniform. Area
superintendents also arranged for the scoring of all except the Free Writing
test. Rechecking indicated that a high degree of grading accuracy was maintained
in the field scoring. All of the Free Writing Tests were scored by a small
group of teachers who worked under the supervision of one of the staff members
from the Chicago Office.
To facilitate a more comprehensive analysis of the background data and test
results, all of the dots collected were coded and entered on punch cards so
that machine computations would be possible. Provision has been made to add
data to these punch cards from time to time to facilitate growth studies and
for making other comparisons.
* A more complete description of methods of research is to be
found in Appendix C.
|