Lessons Taught, Lessons Learned Vol. II
Toward an Integrated, Nonlinear,
Community-Oriented Curriculum Unit
by Mary Short
Fairbanks North Star Borough School District
The Rural and Interior Alaska Instructional
Improvement Academy introduced me to new curriculum models and gave
me the opportunity to review and revise some of my own ideas and
methods about curriculum. While reading Lessons
Taught, Lessons Learned
I found many ideas I will be able to incorporate into my instruction
in the future.
Several of the articles in LT/LL described
a curriculum which was a community-aware, whole-student, activity-based model.
These are some of the areas I would like to
focus on this next year. The community based curriculum mentioned by
Helen Roberts in "The Development of an Integrated Bilingual and
Cross-Cultural Curriculum in an Arctic School District," involves the
community in many aspects of the school functioning. This puts
ownership of the school and the school's success or failure in the
hands of the community as well as the school staff, and creates an
environment which fosters growth, sharing, and mutual respect. These
concepts can also be applied more narrowly to a neighborhood served
by an urban school.
Ray Barnhardt, in his article "Culture,
Community and the Curriculum,"
discusses the "meaningful experience" curriculum. This curriculum
model is used in Nigeria and is applicable to both rural and urban
Alaska. The experience based program utilizes the resources of the
students' community, so that they can become contributing members of
their community. I will use this model in my unit.
"Weaving
Curriculum Webs: The Structure of Nonlinear
Curriculum," by Corwin, Heln and Levin,
gave some wonderful ideas on how to use a whole language unit
approach. This nonlinear style affords a more motivating learning
experience which respects different learning styles and rates and is
easily blended in with community-aware, activity-based models.
Judi Hall of the Juneau School District, one of
the presenters at the Early Childhood Special Education workshop,
focused on the integration of disabled students with their
non-disabled peers. This enables both disabled and non-disabled
people to learn how to deal with each other and gives a clear message
to future citizens that disabled people are vital members of the
community. Educating all members of a community as they would live in
a community, together is a community-sensitive approach.
Patti Herman of the Portage Project in Portage,
Wisconsin, was also a presenter at the Early Childhood Special
Education workshop. Her topic was about parent communication. The
skills Ms. Herman outlined are invaluable for anyone who wants an
open dialogue with parents. Ms. Herman shared needs inventories,
listening skills, and tips on how to lead a parent conference which
facilitates two-way communication. These skills are imperative to my
unit in order for it to succeed. My integrated curriculum unit which
follows attempts to integrate all of the ideas outlined above.
Assessment of Needs
Three assessments must take place when
outlining a unit. The school must assess the needs of the community,
the needs of the family, and the needs of the student.
Roberts stresses patience and compromise when
developing an integrated unit. She reminds us that the community
should be involved in all aspects of the curriculum from school goals
to textbook selection. Adopting her diagrams and flow charts will
guide the school in incorporating the community in its decision
making.
Barnhardt listed the curriculum principles used
by Helser in writing a meaningful experience curriculum. I will not
review the nine principles here, but stress that they are important
guidelines when reviewing and revising curriculum. It is important to
assess the community's social and family life, health and economic
factors and communication patterns and customs. In this curriculum
model, students learn tasks for the purpose of solving a question or
problem, not in order to finish the text or get a grade.
With the input of the community and the above
guidelines the needs of the community as a whole will become
apparent. To assess the particular needs of the families you serve,
more specific assessment tools need to be utilized. Patti Herman of
the Portage Project has devised several assessment tools which are
culturally sensitive and applicable to both rural and urban settings.
They are readily adapted to a community's specific situation. These
tools assess the families need for information, support, and
community services, as well as financial needs and family
functioning.
Assessing the needs of the student consists of
a simple step -ask. The student is asked to think about
what he or she would like to know about. The "I-Search" can be used
as a personal research project conducted by the student about a topic
the student would like to learn more about. With the assistance of
the teacher and the community the students use many different sources
of information to answer their questions, each of which have the word
"I" in it. For example: Would I like to be a smokejumper? Can I make
money selling cookies in town? or, What kind of snow machine should
my family buy? The I-Search is a type of nonlinear curriculum as
discussed by Corwin, Hem and Levin.
Answering I-Search
Questions
The integrated curriculum unit topics can be
chosen once the needs of the community, the family, and the student
have been assessed. The community needs assessment gives the entire
school its focus, general objectives, and long term goals. The family
assessment reveals very specific goals to be met in the immediate
future by the school, family and social agencies. The student needs
assessment tells the teacher and student what questions are important
to the student and gives the teacher the framework in which to teach
the basic academic skills.
Students may brainstorm as a class, in small
groups or with a friend to come up with several problems they want to
search. The topics can be charted for others to see and get
ideas from. The student then must choose which topic to search and
refine that problem into an "I" statement.
As soon as I-Search topics have been chosen the
students will let everyone in the community know their topic, so that
if there is a knowledgeable community member they may become a
resource. If a volunteer has been found the students may tap the
expert's knowledge by interviewing him or her. Questions are written,
revised and rewritten, interviewing is practiced and role playing
takes place. Students devise the best way to take notes and practice
taking notes during the role playing. Telephone skills are reviewed
and then reinforced as the students phone to request an interview or
do a long distance interview. Personal writing and social skills are
discussed and exercised when the students write a thank you note
after the interview has taken place.
Most I-Searches will require library research
in order to gather background information. This affords natural time
to learn library skills and note taking. It is also a logical time to
learn about plagiarism. When library skills and note-taking are
needed by the students in order to answer their questions, the
instruction becomes meaningful and useful.
Students' topics may require them to send away
for information. The students then have the need to learn how to
write a business letter requesting information, and the teacher has a
teachable moment to instruct the students in how to write a business
letter and to help them edit the letter before it is mailed.
While the students are gathering information to
solve a problem they have chosen, they are following through with the
writing process and learning many writing conventions such as
punctuation, capitalization, and standard spelling. The students will
start with a draft and through friends, groups, or the teacher,
locate the confusing areas of the writing and revise their work. The
students will learn how to use spell-checker programs on a word
processor, dictionaries, a thesaurus and other references. The
students work will be edited so that others could benefit from it
should the students choose to share.
A timetable with explicit due dates is a
management necessity. Students receive a calendar so that they may
record these due dates in order to keep themselves on schedule and
avoid procrastination.
The gifted students may want to research a
topic more thoroughly than other students. Their needs should be
accommodated with a more flexible due date. The learning-disabled
students may require more directions and organizational structure in
order to complete their projects. With extra guidance, the students
can still work at the same pace as their non-disabled peers without
being singled out. Mentally handicapped students can be involved in
this model as well, as supported by Judi Hall of the Juneau School
District. The problem to be solved would be based on the community
and families' needs assessment. For example, the community may have
vocational opportunities for the student if s/he is trained, or the
family may feel that toilet training is important.
Evaluation
Grades are a necessity of school life, but what
the grades evaluate and how the grades are devised is up to the
teacher and individual student. Together they specify what components
will be grades - typically information, format, style, writing
conventions, looks and miscellaneous. Within each component it is
agreed upon as to what needs to be accomplished in order to receive a
specific letter grade. By being part of the grading process the
students know what is expected of them and have an investment in the
grading system.
Conclusion
The advantages of the community-oriented,
integrated, nonlinear curriculum far outweigh the extra teacher time
it requires. By utilizing these components students are able to study
what is important to them and their community and to learn the basic
academic curriculum within a meaningful framework.
Foreword
Ray Barnhardt
Part I *
Rural School Ideals
"My
Goodness, People Come and Go So Quickly Around
Here"
Lance C. Blackwood
Parental Involvement
in a Cross-Cultural Environment
Monte Boston
Teachers and
Administrators for Rural Alaska
Claudia Caffee
The Mentor Teacher
Program
Judy Charles
Building
Networks
Helen Eckelman
Ideal Curriculum and
Teaching Approaches for a School in Rural
Alaska
Teresa McConnell
Some Observations
Concerning Excellent Rural Alaskan Schools
Bob Moore
The Ideal Rural
Alaska Village School
Samuel Moses
From Then To Now:
The Value of Experiential Learning
Clara Carol Potterville
The Ideal
School
Jane Seaton
Toward an Integrated,
Nonlinear, Community-Oriented Curriculum
Unit
Mary Short
A Letter from
Idealogak, Alaska
Timothy Stathis
Preparing
Rural Students for the Future
Michael Stockburger
The Ideal
Rural School
Dawn Weyiouanna
Alternative
Approaches to the High School Curriculum
Mark J. Zintek
Part II *
Rural Curriculum Ideas
"Masking" the
Curriculum
Irene Bowie
On Punks and
Culture
Louise J. Britton
Literature to Meet
the Needs of Rural Students
Debra Buchanan
Reaching the Gifted
Student Via the Regular Classroom
Patricia S. Caldwell
Early Childhood Special
Education in Rural Alaska
Colleen Chinn
Technically
Speaking
Wayne Day
Process Learning
Through the School Newspaper
Marilyn Harmon
Glacier Bay
History: A Unit in Cultural Education
David Jaynes
Principals of
Technology
Brian Marsh
Here's Looking
at You and Whole Language
Susan Nugent
Inside, Outside and
all-Around: Learning to Read and Write
Mary L. Olsen
Science Across
the Curriculum
Alice Porter
Here's Looking at
You 2000 Workshop
Cheryl Severns
School-Based
Enterprises
Gerald Sheehan
King Island
Christmas: A Language Arts Unit
Christine Pearsall Villano
Using Student-Produced
Dialogues
Michael A. Wilson
We-Search and
Curriculum Integration in the Community
Sally Young
Artist's
Credits
|