|
|
Lessons Taught, Lessons Learned Vol. I
LEARNING THROUGH
EXPERIENCE
by
Judy Hoeldt
Kaltag
An elementary school that would be
ideal for a rural community would use a process-oriented
curriculum with a project-centered approach to experiential
learning. In this paper, I will describe how a process-oriented
curriculum is developed. In addition, I will explain how the
project approach and the experiential method of learning can be
integrated with the process-oriented curriculum.
Process Oriented
Barnhardt points out in "Culture,
Community and Curriculum"
(see this publication) that "a process-oriented curriculum recasts
content as a means, rather than an end, and it draws on the
students' need to learn as the determinant of the educational
process". Thus, a process-oriented curriculum builds upon the
students' prior knowledge which it seeks to extend or expand. The
following two factors are of utmost importance to this process:
(1) integration of prior knowledge with new knowledge, and (2)
student participation and involvement. A process-oriented
curriculum encourages students to seek their own knowledge and to
employ their individual learning styles. The process-oriented
curriculum involves the students in various levels of thinking
such as inquiring, communicating, organizing, interacting,
inferring, categorizing, experimenting, observing,
decision-making, and problem-solving. With such a curriculum, the
students are the "doers" who are in charge of their own learning,
and the teacher is the facilitator.
A subject-oriented curriculum, on
the other hand, tends to teach fragments of knowledge that are
often not related to real-life situations in rural communities. If
we want rural schools to become successful in educating their
students, we have to involve the students in meaningful learning
experiences, not teach them isolated facts in which the students
are drilled for the sole purpose of getting work done or pleasing
the teacher.
In a process-oriented curriculum,
the former subject categories become integrated through the
students' experience. Does this mean that we have to throw all our
text books away? I believe that text books have their place in a
process-oriented curriculum as information resources to be
explored by the students and the teacher working together as a
team of learners. Curriculum can thus be built by retaining
subject matter but emphasizing the underlying
structure.
I believe that in a
process-oriented curriculum, the teacher's role is very important
(and difficult) because it involves integrating subject matter
with student experience. As a way of doing this, I see the teacher
introducing the students to subject matter that relates to their
everyday experience in the community and then letting the students
develop and pursue their own interests in regard to this subject
matter.
With such an approach, the role of
the teacher would shift from that of a dictator of knowledge to
that of a facilitator of learning. The teacher and student would
explore their physical, cultural, and social environment together.
The process-oriented curriculum thus allows for the community to
become involved in and be a part of an educational process that
builds upon the students' cultural background instead of
segmenting it into twenty-minute bilingual lessons. Such a
curriculum would contribute to helping the students become
informed adults who can relate to their community and culture,
adapt to an ever-changing social and cultural environment, and
interact with members of different cultural groups.
Project Centered
A process-oriented curriculum becomes
most effective when learning takes place under a project-centered approach.
Barnhardt quotes Harrison and Hopkins (see this publication) who provide the
following definition of the term "project": "In reference to a cross-cultural
training program, where 'project' is used to refer to a process-oriented activity
requiring a learner to:
- Obtain information from the
social environment (communication);
- Formulate and test
hypotheses about forces and processes present in the
environment (diagnosis);
- Select and describe some
part of the situation which is to be changed or altered
(problem definition);
- Plan action to solve the
problem (commitment, risk-taking);
- Carry out the action,
enlisting the help and cooperation of others (influencing
and organizing);
- Verbalize attitudes,
perceptions and tentative learnings from experiences
(cognition and generalization)".
Corwin, et al, in their article, "Weaving
Curriculum Webs" (see this
publication), provide an example of a learning project that
focused on a spider that a student had brought to school. The
project covered many subjects such as math, science, language
arts, reading, writing, and art. It involved the students in a
variety of activities ranging from building a spider's home to
drawing spider webs and writing stories about spiders. This
example shows that the project-centered approach is so flexible
that it can be anything from a mini-lesson to a year-long
unit.
I also heard of two teachers in
Ft. Yukon who worked with their students on a year-long travel
project that incorporated all subject areas. The class did math
calculations on mileage, studied the history of different places,
wrote for reservations and tours, kept journals, read about
different places they were to visit, studied maps and worked out
schedules and budgets, and started different business enterprises
to earn money for the trip. Both of these examples show the extent
to which the project-centered approach can involve the students in
subject learning. A science project on rocks, for example, could
cover such academic skills as math (using measurements and
weights), language (writing stories), reading (finding information
on rocks), science (classifying and identifying), and a variety of
process skills such as inference, categorization, classification,
observation, organization, theory formulation, and
identification.
A learning project requires a lot
of advance preparation. The teacher must make sure that materials
and resources are available and that the project includes a wide
enough variety of tasks to provide each student with an
opportunity to learn. Again, the teacher takes the role of the
facilitator and learner.
I think the project-centered
approach is very valuable because it draws on real-life
experiences and includes all academic skills. It's like going from
a small seed and watching it grow and spread over a vast area.
Yet, the most important implication of this approach is that the
students are acquiring skills through applying them to real-life
situations. With the project-centered approach, the students learn
through solving their own problems. Thus, the students are taking
on a new role which is that of a teacher-a seeker of knowledge and
explorer. In this way, the students become accountable for their
own learning as they learn to take on responsibility and to be
proud of their discoveries and achievements.
The project-centered approach
fosters the students' positive self-concept. When completing a
project, the students are not rewarded with a sticker from the
teacher but with their pride in having achieved their goal. The
students' pride in their success can only contribute to a positive
learning environment. I feel that the project-centered approach
gives an independence which contributes to their success and
teaches them how to choose between the different life styles they
are exposed to.
Experiential
Learning
A process-oriented
curriculum with a project-centered approach involves the students
in experiential learning by offering them opportunities to work
out problems by themselves through direct participation in their
environment. The teacher's role in experiential learning requires
that he or she develop personal relationships with individual
students. This can be done through dialogue journals. Dialogue
journals are a form of correspondence between teacher and student.
The students do free-writing, and the teacher reads it and
comments on the students' thoughts, not on grammatical aspects of
their writing. As time goes on, mutual respect and trust
develops.
The experiential method focuses on
spontaneous events and real life phenomena. This method brings the
community and the school together as the students acquire an
understanding of their real-life experiences. Experiential
learning contributes to a better education for rural students
because it considers the students' cultural background. In
addition, it helps the teacher to learn about the students'
culture.
Our educational goal is to prepare
students for the world they will enter upon graduation. In
experiential learning, the student and the teacher are developing
skills the students will need to acquire the abilities to cope
with their future lives. The ideal rural school needs to help
students develop the skills necessary for facing an ever changing
society.
How do we evaluate experiential
learning? Observations on student conduct are the teacher's data.
The students test themselves by evaluating their experiences in
dealing with the world around them. The people in the students
world are the learners' critics, and the students are their own
defense lawyers. If a student tries something and it doesn't work,
that student will learn to try something else. Thus, students'
lack of success isn't viewed as a failure but as another problem
to be resolved. The teacher as a counselor can offer some guidance
for the student engaged in solving his or her own problems. This
guidance might consist of directing the student into different
directions to look for solutions and resources. As the students
are thus learning to test themselves by their own standards and
through critical involvement in and exploration of their world,
they are acquiring knowledge which they will retain for
life.
When I was once asked to think of
my best learning experience, I came up with a project our teacher
had us do. In second grade, we were to explore our world for wood
products. This was a real challenge for me, and I was really proud
of doing this by myself. I had to become involved in my community
and home life to complete this project. Some of the products on my
list were not made of wood, but a group of students were our
critics with whom we discussed our findings and made the necessary
adjustments. This is only a small example of experiential
learning, but it shows how students can become involved in
experimenting and how they can use their own learning styles to
develop skills.
So far, I've described the ideal
rural school as one that uses the process-oriented curriculum, the
project-centered approach and the experiential learning method.
Now I'd like to be more specific and discuss how the school and
the local culture interrelate in many villages. First, I'd like to
explain how schooling is usually done. It's done with a
traditional academic subject-oriented approach where a certain
body of knowledge is transmitted at a certain time of day. Upon
checking the schedule, you might catch reading at 10:00 a.m.,
taught with the district's Ginn reading program. The stories the
students are reading probably contain little information relevant
to their experience. You might see the bilingual teacher at 1:15
p.m. conducting a 20-minute session on vocabulary. You probably
won't hear the students using these words after the lesson. At
other times, you may see the teacher grading papers during the
class period while the students are filling out their workbooks.
This is a small illustration of how rural education looks in many
village schools that I have seen.
In this environment, certain
changes would have to be made to implement a process-oriented
curriculum. The curriculum would have to be developed by the
school district in a fashion similar to that described by Helen
Roberts (see
this publication): "In an
adequately integrated bilingual and cross-cultural curriculum, the
school should reflect the community in every aspect, not just in
revised text materials or special ethnic studies programs. Staff
readiness, community support, and student motivation are keys to
any successful curriculum, regardless of language or culture".
Support from the school district, the community, and the school
staff are crucial to the development of a process-oriented
curriculum. There needs to be clear and precise communication
between administrators, teachers, and the community. It is one
thing to try and change your curriculum but it is another thing to
get the district and community to support you. To reach our goal
of educating rural students to their fullest potential, we have to
wade through a lot of political, economic, and social
barriers.
As a teacher, I often dream of
just teaching the children without going through all the
regulations and stipulations one must plough through to reach a
specific goal. As a teacher, I know where I'm coming from and what
I'm bringing to the classroom. I'm aware of my capabilities, my
determination, enthusiasm, and positive outlook. I can visualize
projects in my classroom. As a teacher, I want to work with a
program that uses to the fullest extent what the students bring to
the classroom. I want to try to involve the community by
participating in community events and by incorporating cultural
learning in all areas of the academic curriculum, such as
language, writing, reading, math, science, history, social
studies, art, etc.
I can see our rural school with
the teacher and the student working as a team to explore the
surrounding environment. I don't see our school as a structure
with a desk, books, individual paper work and tests, but as an
environment conducive to a mutual effort of exploring and
extending the students' and teachers personal experiences. Such an
approach puts into practice a learning theory that is based on the
assumption that students learn from experience.
Foreword
J. Kelly Tonsmiere
Introduction
Ray Barnhardt
Section
I
Some Thoughts on Village
Schooling
"Appropriate
Schools in Rural Alaska"
Todd Bergman, New Stuyahok
"Learning
Through Experience"
Judy Hoeldt, Kaltag
"The
Medium Is The Message For Village
Schools"
Steve Byrd, Wainwright
"Multiple
Intelligences: A Community Learning
Campaign"
Raymond Stein, Sitka
"Obstacles
To A Community-Based Curriculum"
Jim Vait, Eek
"Building
the Dream House"
Mary Moses-Marks, McGrath
"Community
Participation in Rural Education"
George Olana, Shishmaref
"Secondary
Education in Rural Alaska"
Pennee Reinhart, Kiana
"Reflections
on Teaching in the Kuskokwim Delta"
Christine Anderson, Kasigluk
"Some
Thoughts on Curriculum"
Marilyn Harmon, Kotzebue
Section
II
Some Suggestions for the
Curriculum
"Rabbit
Snaring and Language Arts"
Judy Hoeldt, Kaltag
"A Senior
Research Project for Rural High Schools"
Dave Ringle, St. Mary's
"Curriculum
Projects for the Pacific Region,"
Roberta Hogue Davis, College
"Resources
for Exploring Japan's Cultural Heritage"
Raymond Stein, Sitka
"Alaskans
Experience Japanese Culture Through
Music"
Rosemary Branham, Kenai
Section
III
Some Alternative
Perspectives
"The
Axe Handle Academy: A Proposal for a Bioregional, Thematic
Humanities Education"
Ron and Suzanne Scollon
"Culture,
Community and the Curriculum"
Ray Barnhardt
"The
Development of an Integrated Bilingual and Cross-Cultural
Curriculum in an Arctic School District"
Helen Roberts
"Weaving
Curriculum Webs: The Structure of Nonlinear
Curriculum"
Rebecca Corwin, George E. Hem and Diane Levin
Artists'
Credits
|
The
University of Alaska Fairbanks is an Affirmative
Action/Equal Opportunity employer, educational
institution, and provider is a part of the University of Alaska
system. Learn more about UA's notice of nondiscrimination.
Alaska Native Knowledge
Network
University of Alaska Fairbanks
PO Box 756730
Fairbanks AK 99775-6730
Phone (907) 474.1902
Fax (907) 474.1957 |
Questions or comments?
Contact ANKN |
|
Last
modified
August 14, 2006
|
|
|